The Howard government's corrupt human rights record, from detention centre prisoner abuse at home, citizens held and abused by USA military of terrorism charges with zero evidence. Canberra's loathing to respond adequately to calls by detainees for consular assistance. It's an easy leap to depreciate Howard's reason of security for Japanese engineers, or anyone's safety for that matter as authentic to justify more troops in Iraq. That role paints an acceptable facade to the public.
Australia will boost its military force in Iraq by 450 troops to protect Japanese engineers in the south of Iraq. Contrary to the Howard government's public front for why these troops are necessary, a more sinister reason might drive this deployment?
A crumbling coalition of countries pulls forces out of Iraq. Country after country sees the writing on the wall of escalation into civil war. An attempt to forestall the departure of foreign forces to "get the hell out of Iraq" - is integral to the Australian deployment. Despite attempts to hold the "coalition" - the larger coincidence with Australian troop deployment is Japan's confirmation of acceptance to pay fist fulls more dollars to fuel hefty iron ore earnings increases and target prices for giant Rio Tinto. The mining cartel will haul in a 71.5% price increase for iron ore and 63% price rise of manganese ore to Japanese steel mills.
The effect from Japan's cooperation to escalate prices pushes Rio Tinto profit for fiscal 2005 to projected $4.2 billion - up 25%. An identical profit forecast of $4.2 billion in fiscal 2006 is also projected. Is this money trail the quid pro quo for sending troops?
According to a report in the Sydney Morning Herald Britains defence Minister, Geoff Hoon discussed in mid-January with Australia's defence minister, Robert Hill about the possible deployment of more Australian troops. The request from the Blair Government raises suspicion Canberra acts as paid mercenary? With payoffs through raw materials wealth sold to Japan. Rape the market place, and costs paid by a taxpayer funded military at A$350 million for one year's deployment.
The deployment is considered "all the more essential" in light of the "very successful" election held on January 30 in Iraq," says Howard. The standard platitudes of a "significant contribution to the coalition effort" and "contribution to the rebuilding of Iraq" were offered up for good measure to mollify the public.
Significantly the interests of Her Majesty the Queen of England will receive an incredible boost in prosperity from Rio Tinto's windfall price increases for iron ore. A private investment fund of Elizabeth II, the Queen's Trust as the major dominant political and financial power in Rio Tinto, is guaranteed a healthy percentage of Rio Tinto's boosted iron ore sales. The Queen of England has through the Australian Governor General political power, and via British banking and significant British ownership of Australian corporate power a capacity to wage advantageous moves of the economic tools over Australia.
Her Majesty's U.K. government and request by the Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, pushes Australian troops to an act of resource profiteering paid by taxpayers and potential military fatalities. Consider the above argument with announcements between Rio Tinto and Nippon Steel [the major Japanese corporation agreeing to higher iron ore prices] to work closely together to benefit each other?
If this isn't a hot bed of profitable collusion of incredible manipulation of controls over global hegemony? Of corporate interests motivations over resources, and government complicity of imperialist interests, then I don't what else will qualify?
No comments:
Post a Comment