Attorney General Ruddock is Oddball over anti-terrorist laws

Consider for a second Attorney General Ruddock’s failed logic, his peremptory pain-in-the-ass hogwash. His conclusion from his tit tat with the ACT’s Jon Stanhope highlights a view that terrorists across this land hold a common thread? That common thread is their convergance of evil… a need to commit terror unleashed by annihilative minds only at sites where “weak” anti-terroism law enforcement exists?

Ruddock believes anti-terrorist fun and games will be handicaped by dissimilar laws between Canberra and Bondi Junction. This might be a display of paltry faith in law enforcement and the intelligence community? With different anti-terrorism thinking for officers to grapple with in the face of fighting the war on terror it could send some over the mental enforcement edge.

The Attorney General’s oddball sapience edifies an abstract, perhaps eerie rendition of anti-terrorism policing. Ruddock’s argument is hammered in noisy leaps against the sovereignty of others judgments, especially officials such as the qualified Jon Stanhope - who don’t play the anti-terrorism card Ruddock’s way.

Ruddock operates a peculiar “doctrine of inference” - it’s folklore, but it fundamentally believes terrorists unleash horror and sabotage in territories and places where laws are pithy – [compared to Ruddock’s version of enforcement]. If it’s a frail anti-terrorist law it fails Ruddock's acid test, that is not being equal to his expert appraisal. The result is substitution of the whole ball of anti-terrorist wax for a resize to suit Ruddock. Canberra cogitates that conformity across Australia equals we’re all safer?

By extrapolation of Ruddock’s thesis… we can form a loose clarity able to breathe security from the threat of frightening [government inflamed?] terrorism. The many strategic cool targets across this real estate can take advantage of Ruddock’s thinking - we will detour terrorists to hit only designated sitting ducks by location.

The plan is renounce anti-terrorism laws in remote areas of Australia. In isolated pockets such as King Island in Bass Strait; we will abandon anti-terrorist laws for designated special low-law intensity sites. Any indecent terrorist stunt or planned terrorist event would be unleashed under this policy away from the rest of the country. Isolated places in Bass Strait are the perfect terrorist sitting duck. By preserving terrorists under the easy-go low-law anti-terrorist program we are miles safer in this war on terrorism game.

We’ll designate the site a low-law terrorist heaven, it will attract the menace, [terrorism I mean, not Ruddock]. It can work, install make believe cardboard fuel dumps, fake ammo dumps and a couple of military HQ like buildings with visiting politicians lolly gagging around, hands behind their backs! Erect mock cardboard cutouts of tourists for a full “bring em on” effect. [Don’t you just love these cool Bush team rallying slogans courtesy Ruddock and Howard’s administration’s White House pals]?

Its common knowledge terrorists make beelines at targets exposed inside territory with go-easy interrogation and special sentencing. If we erect signs in airports to inform visiting terrorists of where the pithy anti-terrorist enforcement exists, we’ll garner our fair share of terrorists like flies to a jam jar. A King Island terrorist jam jar. This measure could protect a terrified citizenry from the threat Ruddock stresses is ready to chew our asses to shreds.

A bold move would be to advertise our go-easy anti-terrorist law regions around the global - reflective of the globalisation policy adopted in Canberra. Signs for inbound terrorists at our gateway airports and in our neighbour’s airport terminals, sea-lanes and wherever entry points for terrorists to walk in exist will be integral to direct the traffic.

Identifying where terrorists enter Australia is simple… Ruddock is a freaking whiz bang on the terrorism argument. He’s the official to pinpoint terrorist gateways, wherever he says, that’s where we sit signs.

The signs advice would also tell terrorists if they are caught detonating a terrorist event on King Island - we’ll go easy on them. What’s the loss in a few milkers, windy fields and noisy sea birds in exchange for the nation’s security? Sacrifice King Island for the safety of the nation.

Any protest by King Island citizens? The Attorney General can introduce penalties against disruption. A five-year jail sentence for non-conformity with Canberra’s neo-con fascist kings sounds about right. Ruddocks “Across Oz Same Same Easy Grasp Terrorism Laws” are the way to fly if you want to stay out of harm. Ruddock will avoid disquiet by imposing a prison term on all citizens who talk about what’s happening to them at King Island. Blab and publicise what happened to you at Ruddock’s hands… you would be sentenced under anti-terrorism provisions. Although it won’t matter for heaven’s sake if apprehended citizens want to blab anyway. Who will know where King Island is? Ruddock and Howard can be matriarchs of Australia’s King Island Guantanamo. Such a turn-on, an oddball like Ruddock would wet his pants over such an idea? Troublemakers could be locked up Guantanamo style without explanation.

As for this nonsense with Jon Stanhope “stuffing up the Ruddock way.” Stanhope’s strife means his time to learn to fall in line with the other sheepish premiers and state chiefs? The time is ripe for Ruddock to adopt another Bushite rallying cry winner, ‘Your either with us or against us!” Runing with this biggie of the New World Order, he can shove it down the throats of tremulous Aussies, it might turn the people against tall poppies like Stanhope and any others thinking out of line.

All in the name of heading off danger the Oddball says is ahead!

Obvious if Lebanon Had Nuclear Deterrence Israeli Government Could Go Screw Itself

If Lebanon possessed the same shielding miltary hardware of North Korea would the murdering swines of Israel’s Devil Government still launch their pre-planned offensive against [claimed Hezbollah] targets on Lebanese territory?

A crushing bombing “strike and awe” execrable mayhem on Lebanon, an offensive calculated to inflict intense casualties on innocent humanity and destroy noncombatant infrastructure. Irrefutable evidence IDF devastation targeted against innocent civilians including children, foreign tourists and massive deliberate destruction of homes, commerce and basic utilities. The blowing up of power generation, water plants and road infrastructure severs any possibilty for survival of daily life for the Labanese people.

So extensive is the reckless squandering of life and ruin perpetrated on Lebanese territory it raises the shocking examination of what the hell is Israel’s intent? My conclusion is Israel’s reason is a premeditated aim to ignite, enrage and engage the widest and deepest potential angered Arab response. It is to provoke Arab counteraction for the magnitude of slaying and mayhem in Lebanon? In particular the targets are Iran and Syria, to pull them into war against Israel, thereby triggering a seemingly defensive USA military response in retaliation.

It may seem effortless for Israel to pour destruction on Southern Lebanon, whilst the IDF only need worry itself from a modest capability of small misiles and small arms fire from Hezbollah. The copiously armed IDF would be subservient in rank were its bullheaded onslaught faced with a fully armed nuclear Lebanon.

The cruelty of Israel against civilians by its lunatic military cocksureness can only be checked, only be repeled when the target nation readies in its armourery the tactical authority of nuclear deterrance. This is the power that can deter - the force to shield by mutal assured destruction [MAD] that weapons of mass destruction could enforce. Technically superior weaponry to Israel gives the same protection. If Lebanon could stare the Israeli bully in the face and counter their aggression with a nuclear weapon it would instil a little more respect before unleashing the Zionist dogs of war.

Clearly an overwhelming case supports the responsibility of Arab states that share a border with the Devil state of Israel to have the same deterrence power as North Korea. It is found a necessity for protection.

A nuclear-armed Lebanon would have detered the beligerant Nazi brute of Zionist Israel from attacking. The feral attack in subsidy of neo-fascist warmongers of the Bush/Cheney Washington would be checkmated.

How could the Israeli Government perpetrate egregious war crimes with imunity on their insane road of igniting a "clash of civilization’s" Armageddon - if faced by the reprisal of nuclear deterrence?

This is why Iran and Syria must have nuclear weapons.