John Howard is the last individual in Canberra you should believe with the current plan for 10 Billion spending on the Murray Darling River system. The agenda for taxpayer money is developing water infrastructure upgraded to appease a moaning electorate. The Government's objective is slicing public opinion off the concept of their God given right to naturally occuring resources, in this instance its water access, but it will probably be the air we breathe next, under the guise of carbon trading. To reshape public thinking into acceptance to pay exorbitant rates for water supplied from a for profit privatised corporate operation and not the State.
A deliberate intention to destroy the infrastructure and developments of past years under state funded water projects and instead attempt to live inside a minimum capital, maximum rate water supply with the poor saps of Australia paying through the nose.
13 Feb 2007
3 Feb 2007
The Media Cover and Reporting of BHP alarm over PM's river plan.
The media reports of a collision course between the Prime Minister and mining giant BHP Billiton over a 1982 agreement with the South Australian Government. This concerns BHP’s Olympic Dam uranium, gold and copper mine and the neighbouring town of Roxby Downs drawing 33 million litres of water a day from the Great Artesian Basin free of charge.
On the surface the report gives the impression of a genuine dispute between John Howard and the big mining giant. But the clue to the real intent of the message is a different outcome; it is covertly inside the issue quite different from the perception the report appears about.
The report is clearly another Big Brother step towards an eventual target of total control and metering of all water flows in Australia. The implication the general public will miss is that they are being cleverly programmed and set up to accept a blanket imposition of fees and increasing rates for each litre of water – no matter what the source for that water might be.
The first priority is to realise there is no possible way for the Federal Government to impose its political will over BHP. If you believe the incredible financial muscle and political power of BHP can be hauled over the coals in a Federal Government contest over water you do not understand the manipulation and connections between the way the powers of this nation really manipulated and operates.
Recognise that the set-up of the populace is built in with an implied wrong. An unjust, unfair special arrangement that a huge recognised giant corporation as BHP Biliton uses water free of charge, at a time of sacrifice asked of the population during the drought. The report says if a household used as much water as BHP is taking for free its daily bill would be $52,000. The predictable reaction on reading this information is, “Why is a huge corporation getting for free what I must pay for, how unfair?” This is an anticipated reaction the Internationalist predicts in their fee for everything that has a flow associated with it mentality.
The fact that the Prime Minister declares “Everybody’s got to make a contribution to solving this problem.” He is manipulating and repositioning the general populace to go along with him, the reader of the report must surely agree BHP should rightfully pay for water they are not paying anyone for using.
The point of the dispute is not for BHP to pay for water they draw from the Great Artesian Basin. The target of the dispute is to build and attach in the minds of the public an unmistakable association between water and our social duty to pay for all water used by all persons in society. Through social engineering this dispute builds from its apparent straightforward single issue into an assumption of fact that asserts dominence over a natural resource by the government because of crafting of the dispute.
This dispute is a set up that condition Australia’s public to accept the imposition of meters on all sources of water across the nation. All residential tanks that collect rainwater off a home’s roof, all aquifiers that feed all business and domestic users, all bores from the smallest to the biggest draw down are targetted for billable metering of water consumption. It will not matter that the property the bore is sunk is private property, it will make a difference the rainwater falls on your home’s roof or your commercial property. The objective from the creation of the BHP Biliton dispute and the PM’s alarm is to condition your response to the permanent shifting of control and regulation over all water resources.
Whether you feel BHP Biliton should pay for the water they use is not at issue here. BHP has invested more than $100 million over the past 20 years in pipelines, bores and pumps. The export earnings from the mining activity are sure to overshadow the volume of water drawn down and the possible charges for water if it were billed by the state.
What is at work is a self-destructive intimidation of the populace.
If the response to the dispute is overwhelming nodding of agreement by the general public that the huge wealthy BHP Biliton must pay its “fair share” – something hard to argue with if you are a wage earner. Then the desired futureplay has been processed, a new-fashioned paradigm is accepted whereby the general public now agrees virtually unconsciously to dominence over water resources. The authority of the state – even when the water is drawn from a self-funded infrastructure, including the holding tank filled from the roof of your home attains dominence of a basic life giving resource. Only the reason for achieving dominence is economic not human welfare.
A perception filtered through society that is constructed from incorrect manipulated thought ultimately makes all of us a target of economic hit men. The time for thinking is now, understand a subterfuge for takeover of the nation’s resources including its citizens as a commodity, the basic neccessities of water, food and our future is taking place. The people through social engineering have given influence and control over the economics of their lives to an alliance between the Cabinet of the Federal Government, major corporations, central banking and the premptive war agenda of the Howard, Bush, Blair alliance.
On the surface the report gives the impression of a genuine dispute between John Howard and the big mining giant. But the clue to the real intent of the message is a different outcome; it is covertly inside the issue quite different from the perception the report appears about.
The report is clearly another Big Brother step towards an eventual target of total control and metering of all water flows in Australia. The implication the general public will miss is that they are being cleverly programmed and set up to accept a blanket imposition of fees and increasing rates for each litre of water – no matter what the source for that water might be.
The first priority is to realise there is no possible way for the Federal Government to impose its political will over BHP. If you believe the incredible financial muscle and political power of BHP can be hauled over the coals in a Federal Government contest over water you do not understand the manipulation and connections between the way the powers of this nation really manipulated and operates.
Recognise that the set-up of the populace is built in with an implied wrong. An unjust, unfair special arrangement that a huge recognised giant corporation as BHP Biliton uses water free of charge, at a time of sacrifice asked of the population during the drought. The report says if a household used as much water as BHP is taking for free its daily bill would be $52,000. The predictable reaction on reading this information is, “Why is a huge corporation getting for free what I must pay for, how unfair?” This is an anticipated reaction the Internationalist predicts in their fee for everything that has a flow associated with it mentality.
The fact that the Prime Minister declares “Everybody’s got to make a contribution to solving this problem.” He is manipulating and repositioning the general populace to go along with him, the reader of the report must surely agree BHP should rightfully pay for water they are not paying anyone for using.
The point of the dispute is not for BHP to pay for water they draw from the Great Artesian Basin. The target of the dispute is to build and attach in the minds of the public an unmistakable association between water and our social duty to pay for all water used by all persons in society. Through social engineering this dispute builds from its apparent straightforward single issue into an assumption of fact that asserts dominence over a natural resource by the government because of crafting of the dispute.
This dispute is a set up that condition Australia’s public to accept the imposition of meters on all sources of water across the nation. All residential tanks that collect rainwater off a home’s roof, all aquifiers that feed all business and domestic users, all bores from the smallest to the biggest draw down are targetted for billable metering of water consumption. It will not matter that the property the bore is sunk is private property, it will make a difference the rainwater falls on your home’s roof or your commercial property. The objective from the creation of the BHP Biliton dispute and the PM’s alarm is to condition your response to the permanent shifting of control and regulation over all water resources.
Whether you feel BHP Biliton should pay for the water they use is not at issue here. BHP has invested more than $100 million over the past 20 years in pipelines, bores and pumps. The export earnings from the mining activity are sure to overshadow the volume of water drawn down and the possible charges for water if it were billed by the state.
What is at work is a self-destructive intimidation of the populace.
If the response to the dispute is overwhelming nodding of agreement by the general public that the huge wealthy BHP Biliton must pay its “fair share” – something hard to argue with if you are a wage earner. Then the desired futureplay has been processed, a new-fashioned paradigm is accepted whereby the general public now agrees virtually unconsciously to dominence over water resources. The authority of the state – even when the water is drawn from a self-funded infrastructure, including the holding tank filled from the roof of your home attains dominence of a basic life giving resource. Only the reason for achieving dominence is economic not human welfare.
A perception filtered through society that is constructed from incorrect manipulated thought ultimately makes all of us a target of economic hit men. The time for thinking is now, understand a subterfuge for takeover of the nation’s resources including its citizens as a commodity, the basic neccessities of water, food and our future is taking place. The people through social engineering have given influence and control over the economics of their lives to an alliance between the Cabinet of the Federal Government, major corporations, central banking and the premptive war agenda of the Howard, Bush, Blair alliance.
18 Jan 2007
Opportunity for Australia of Free Investment Cash
If the high priests of Canberra and their ultra top heavy corporate shifty pals are looking for bucket loads of cash, and who isn't? You've heard of "Where the bloody hell are you?" Now its found, the Mother Lode is on Australia’s bloody doorstep
The truly aspiring globalisers of Howards crooked fascist cabinet will be beside themselves wondering how much they can syphon off for their offshore banking accounts. These crooks have to own some secret cash stacked away from profiting corporate friends. Hell how could you screw more than 80% of the Australian population just for a politician’s wage?
Two wicked Presidents, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are ready to spend billions of dollars (or euros more likely) financing projects in other countries if you have the right credentials.
These oil rich nations have cash available to be used for projects in friendly third countries. Hell Australia is friendly… my mistake, we used to be friendly until we signed on with the preemptive warfare idiocy of the Anglo-American nuts we foolishly align our sorry Canberra butts with. At the cost to our self esteem, our free thinking, our international standing, our low morale standing and chicken shit manipulation from Canberra of the Australian population.
We know how easily Australia’s Federal Government is bought off by any influence other than the general Australian populace. So a tidy project to underpin investment in countries whose governments are making efforts to liberate themselves from the (US) imperialist yoke is sure to be a winner with our internationalists. Face it! If Canberra can be brought off once by the Anglo-American money circle it can be brought off twice when the stakes and cash are high enough by the Persian-South American oil circle boys?
We seem to be running light on cash for major infrastructure these days. Obviously the available money for our public health system is running low, given as a levy is going to be needed to run the medical system. Then there is the need for capital to build electricity generation, plainly nothing for this as we have a shaky electric supply making Australia look more like a developing country each summer. Also if my memory serves me right quite a few of the schools could do with some cash for repairs and long overdue for teaching equipment to match the private schools. Oh and we used to have a state funded university system, so that apparently needs some cash. Man I’m sure one or two more items would come to mind if I think about it.
Of course there is, we need some water in Australia. Given the remarkable absence of new dam construction, or pipeline delivery systems to move water around the country, like from where it is up north to where it isn’t down south. I mean we’ve got to the stage where The Age newspaper is running articles about the farmer tossing the game in, leave the land. Forgotten to protect our infrastructure to preserve our capacity to feed ourselves, or export foods have we? Because I would think with some free piles of investment cash we could spend freely to construct the water supply infrastructure we apparently can’t afford in 2007. How many years is it we’ve known of this business of residing on the driest continent on the planet? Messy how overdue stuff like selling off the country and not construcing infrastructure behind a bunch of claptrap catches up with one eventually?
Now Venezuela and Iran are probably willing to come to Australia’s rescue? Providing Canberra makes one slight adjustment to their thus far demonstrated screwy thinking! What terrific news for the lucky country that we might become the lucky country again, providing Canberra puts its hands out, head down and shares in some oil bucks courtesy messers Chavez and Ahmadinejad?
Realistically I know it’s a stretch to expect Canberra to wean itself off the US imperialist yoke for the hard cash. But the point is our puppet like stride with Bush and Cheney costs Australia’s people big time. First our global friends are falling off the boardwalk as we strutt in the shadow of a big military bully US juggernaut. Speaking of which we are chucking bucket loads of taxpayer hard earned cash down the toilet despatching our military into Iraq, Afghanistan, the South Pacific and probably Somalia if we look a harder. Given the penchant for mercenery contracts for our men and women in uniform these days our military is on stand by anywhere Bush & Cheney sends them. No matter what perception Howard tries to tell you to fall for– Canberra won’t want to miss out on the fireworks coming up when USA starts killing Iranians behind a bombing and heavy missile attack justified by a pack of fabricated terrorist nonsense and nuclear non-threat bull.
Anyway go ahead Canberra, change your stripes for some hefty oil cash. We don’t mind, hell Howard and the boys have pushed the old leopard skin and his spots trick so many times he can readily give George W. Bush a lame excuse for our preemptive economic switch to the so called destabilizing influence of Hugo and Mahmoud. Howard’s given Australia plenty of pathetic excuses of fairy tales of terrorism threats at home to why a haul of industrial relations laws had to be abonded for the forces pushing down upon this nation of dirt cheap labour by that nasty China and dirt cheap India.
Why wouldn’t Australia be the least bothered to side with a couple of nations that are actually spending money on their own nation’s infrastructure and helping their own population?
Help yourself get reelected Prime Minister Howard, Costello, Downer and the boys and liberate yourselves from the unpredictable dangerous US imperialist yoke, be a friendly third country on the receiving end of joint cooperation bid as allies in a Persian-South America-Australia pact. It even sounds cool!
The truly aspiring globalisers of Howards crooked fascist cabinet will be beside themselves wondering how much they can syphon off for their offshore banking accounts. These crooks have to own some secret cash stacked away from profiting corporate friends. Hell how could you screw more than 80% of the Australian population just for a politician’s wage?
Two wicked Presidents, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are ready to spend billions of dollars (or euros more likely) financing projects in other countries if you have the right credentials.
These oil rich nations have cash available to be used for projects in friendly third countries. Hell Australia is friendly… my mistake, we used to be friendly until we signed on with the preemptive warfare idiocy of the Anglo-American nuts we foolishly align our sorry Canberra butts with. At the cost to our self esteem, our free thinking, our international standing, our low morale standing and chicken shit manipulation from Canberra of the Australian population.
We know how easily Australia’s Federal Government is bought off by any influence other than the general Australian populace. So a tidy project to underpin investment in countries whose governments are making efforts to liberate themselves from the (US) imperialist yoke is sure to be a winner with our internationalists. Face it! If Canberra can be brought off once by the Anglo-American money circle it can be brought off twice when the stakes and cash are high enough by the Persian-South American oil circle boys?
We seem to be running light on cash for major infrastructure these days. Obviously the available money for our public health system is running low, given as a levy is going to be needed to run the medical system. Then there is the need for capital to build electricity generation, plainly nothing for this as we have a shaky electric supply making Australia look more like a developing country each summer. Also if my memory serves me right quite a few of the schools could do with some cash for repairs and long overdue for teaching equipment to match the private schools. Oh and we used to have a state funded university system, so that apparently needs some cash. Man I’m sure one or two more items would come to mind if I think about it.
Of course there is, we need some water in Australia. Given the remarkable absence of new dam construction, or pipeline delivery systems to move water around the country, like from where it is up north to where it isn’t down south. I mean we’ve got to the stage where The Age newspaper is running articles about the farmer tossing the game in, leave the land. Forgotten to protect our infrastructure to preserve our capacity to feed ourselves, or export foods have we? Because I would think with some free piles of investment cash we could spend freely to construct the water supply infrastructure we apparently can’t afford in 2007. How many years is it we’ve known of this business of residing on the driest continent on the planet? Messy how overdue stuff like selling off the country and not construcing infrastructure behind a bunch of claptrap catches up with one eventually?
Now Venezuela and Iran are probably willing to come to Australia’s rescue? Providing Canberra makes one slight adjustment to their thus far demonstrated screwy thinking! What terrific news for the lucky country that we might become the lucky country again, providing Canberra puts its hands out, head down and shares in some oil bucks courtesy messers Chavez and Ahmadinejad?
Realistically I know it’s a stretch to expect Canberra to wean itself off the US imperialist yoke for the hard cash. But the point is our puppet like stride with Bush and Cheney costs Australia’s people big time. First our global friends are falling off the boardwalk as we strutt in the shadow of a big military bully US juggernaut. Speaking of which we are chucking bucket loads of taxpayer hard earned cash down the toilet despatching our military into Iraq, Afghanistan, the South Pacific and probably Somalia if we look a harder. Given the penchant for mercenery contracts for our men and women in uniform these days our military is on stand by anywhere Bush & Cheney sends them. No matter what perception Howard tries to tell you to fall for– Canberra won’t want to miss out on the fireworks coming up when USA starts killing Iranians behind a bombing and heavy missile attack justified by a pack of fabricated terrorist nonsense and nuclear non-threat bull.
Anyway go ahead Canberra, change your stripes for some hefty oil cash. We don’t mind, hell Howard and the boys have pushed the old leopard skin and his spots trick so many times he can readily give George W. Bush a lame excuse for our preemptive economic switch to the so called destabilizing influence of Hugo and Mahmoud. Howard’s given Australia plenty of pathetic excuses of fairy tales of terrorism threats at home to why a haul of industrial relations laws had to be abonded for the forces pushing down upon this nation of dirt cheap labour by that nasty China and dirt cheap India.
Why wouldn’t Australia be the least bothered to side with a couple of nations that are actually spending money on their own nation’s infrastructure and helping their own population?
Help yourself get reelected Prime Minister Howard, Costello, Downer and the boys and liberate yourselves from the unpredictable dangerous US imperialist yoke, be a friendly third country on the receiving end of joint cooperation bid as allies in a Persian-South America-Australia pact. It even sounds cool!
15 Dec 2006
Australian troops in Iraq
How much evidence do we need to see that Australia's government and military in Iraq is not part of the solution, it is part of the problem?
Painted in simple terms - Canberra's support of war criminals in the Bush/Cheney Administration leads to make Australia's political leaders guilty as accessories in war crimes, no different as if they had murdered innocent Iraqis, terrorised and destabilised Iraqis personally - and risk exploding the whole damned Middle East. The support by Howard's corrupt administration, the equally pathetic connivance of the ALP [Rudd same as Beasley opposition party) with support and assistance in Iraq [and Afghanistan], the greater is Prime Minister Howard, Foreign Minister Downer, the Howard Cabinet and Shadow Cabinet of Australia's leaders tied to the reality of their ultimate sentence of guilt of horredous war crimes against innocent people of a sovereign Iraq.
Canberra's rough ride of immorality as member in the posse of America's Sheriff of the world coalition blood bath, government manufactured Orwellian "War on Terror" is corporate branding of an arrogant geopolitical agenda. Its a Clever Dick theme (War on Terror, War on Extremism, whatever fits today) and it profiles Canberra's arrogance, its shoving and manipulation of an electorate grown weary and now angry at the very worst lies.
AUSTRALIA'S MILITARY DOES NOT HAVE A ROLE IN IRAQ. Australia's military and capital is being misapropriated in a criminal spendup to pursue population reduction and strategic objectives over the Middle East through murdering innocent Iraqis. Canberra is base to the most pathetic representatives this nation has ever been subjected to live under. Through our great [past] friend the USA Administration launched a horrendous miscarriage of justice, but true justice has a way to ultimately level out those who follow the illegal path. We should all look forward to such a period of public lynching.
Painted in simple terms - Canberra's support of war criminals in the Bush/Cheney Administration leads to make Australia's political leaders guilty as accessories in war crimes, no different as if they had murdered innocent Iraqis, terrorised and destabilised Iraqis personally - and risk exploding the whole damned Middle East. The support by Howard's corrupt administration, the equally pathetic connivance of the ALP [Rudd same as Beasley opposition party) with support and assistance in Iraq [and Afghanistan], the greater is Prime Minister Howard, Foreign Minister Downer, the Howard Cabinet and Shadow Cabinet of Australia's leaders tied to the reality of their ultimate sentence of guilt of horredous war crimes against innocent people of a sovereign Iraq.
Canberra's rough ride of immorality as member in the posse of America's Sheriff of the world coalition blood bath, government manufactured Orwellian "War on Terror" is corporate branding of an arrogant geopolitical agenda. Its a Clever Dick theme (War on Terror, War on Extremism, whatever fits today) and it profiles Canberra's arrogance, its shoving and manipulation of an electorate grown weary and now angry at the very worst lies.
AUSTRALIA'S MILITARY DOES NOT HAVE A ROLE IN IRAQ. Australia's military and capital is being misapropriated in a criminal spendup to pursue population reduction and strategic objectives over the Middle East through murdering innocent Iraqis. Canberra is base to the most pathetic representatives this nation has ever been subjected to live under. Through our great [past] friend the USA Administration launched a horrendous miscarriage of justice, but true justice has a way to ultimately level out those who follow the illegal path. We should all look forward to such a period of public lynching.
8 Oct 2006
Attorney General Ruddock - A slippery eel or fruitcake?
Caught an ABC radio interview of the Attorney General in August. My reaction after listening? The guy is a slippery eel or a full blown fruitcake.
The Attorney General responds to questions shot his way with a "duck and weave" formula, Blind Freddie would discern unmistakably this official is plainly not an authentic article? You can judge Ruddock is more a Lilliputian; a consequential government employee so he should be an important public servant? But his behaviour is more hired hand! Bet my bottom dollar this fruit cake is a puppet to hegemony seekers outside official public recognition?
The Attorney General’s language is chock a bloc full of distortion, little honesty is injected on the job. An indispensable characteristic of a real attorney general embodies accuracy and honesty; examination of this fruit cake's gazette is such judicious traits have cut class.
Moral and fair defence of the Australian citizen’s rights is abandoned for pathetic fallacious public relations, and a model of arrogance hidden within intimidation and coercian of the citizen whilst prosecuting the pampered darling, an endless war against terror. Ruddock rapes the citizen whilst he pretends to uphold the law - as he interprets its revision for Australia’s constituent police state.
The Attorney General confers sleeze and manipulation; he is a master of sophistry, responds to inquiry with bluster delivered inside non-answers. His public face is tedious and flat; misrepresentation through a string of laborious clarification, mingled with enough legalese to fool most. His is a bluster technique holding authoritative ground with interviewers and listener alike, by autocratic officious puffiness he restrains reality and truth from sight.
A listener grows tired fishing for a cohesive and authentic response. Half expect interviewers to wrap up interviews with Ruddock. Waiting and anticipating Ruddock will eventually reply with at least one straight answer about David Hicks is tiring. With a basic question, “When is Hicks being returned to Australia and what is the Government doing to help the situation?” Its a run around the bush Ruddock adopts to [not] answer the question. The top justice man in Canberra is a slippery eel or a fruitcake.
Asked about the return of David Hicks to Australia from Guantanamo military base after Hicks has been in the lock-up for 5 years? Croaked with nervousness, quivering with deceit Ruddock unhesitatingly clouded Canberra’s position with his I’m not my own man reply. Saying, “…such matters take a long time”. Talk about failure to demonstrate one iota of concern about Hicks case.
I conclude [with legion of others] Ruddock takes inaction to ensure Hicks stays far from Australia for the longest possible time. To the interviewer’s credit she reminded Ruddock of the five years already Hicks has been in Guantanamo and still detained in USA custody, still in jail. By asking, “How much time does it take for Hicks to be returned?”
Judging by Ruddock’s vacuity our Attorney General answers questions in a fashion that betrays him working to a nefarious agenda, a contrived opposing agenda of Australia. He is a puppet, a voice of subservience in obsequiousness to the Bush administration and its liberty killing focus?
The Attorney General responds to questions shot his way with a "duck and weave" formula, Blind Freddie would discern unmistakably this official is plainly not an authentic article? You can judge Ruddock is more a Lilliputian; a consequential government employee so he should be an important public servant? But his behaviour is more hired hand! Bet my bottom dollar this fruit cake is a puppet to hegemony seekers outside official public recognition?
The Attorney General’s language is chock a bloc full of distortion, little honesty is injected on the job. An indispensable characteristic of a real attorney general embodies accuracy and honesty; examination of this fruit cake's gazette is such judicious traits have cut class.
Moral and fair defence of the Australian citizen’s rights is abandoned for pathetic fallacious public relations, and a model of arrogance hidden within intimidation and coercian of the citizen whilst prosecuting the pampered darling, an endless war against terror. Ruddock rapes the citizen whilst he pretends to uphold the law - as he interprets its revision for Australia’s constituent police state.
The Attorney General confers sleeze and manipulation; he is a master of sophistry, responds to inquiry with bluster delivered inside non-answers. His public face is tedious and flat; misrepresentation through a string of laborious clarification, mingled with enough legalese to fool most. His is a bluster technique holding authoritative ground with interviewers and listener alike, by autocratic officious puffiness he restrains reality and truth from sight.
A listener grows tired fishing for a cohesive and authentic response. Half expect interviewers to wrap up interviews with Ruddock. Waiting and anticipating Ruddock will eventually reply with at least one straight answer about David Hicks is tiring. With a basic question, “When is Hicks being returned to Australia and what is the Government doing to help the situation?” Its a run around the bush Ruddock adopts to [not] answer the question. The top justice man in Canberra is a slippery eel or a fruitcake.
Asked about the return of David Hicks to Australia from Guantanamo military base after Hicks has been in the lock-up for 5 years? Croaked with nervousness, quivering with deceit Ruddock unhesitatingly clouded Canberra’s position with his I’m not my own man reply. Saying, “…such matters take a long time”. Talk about failure to demonstrate one iota of concern about Hicks case.
I conclude [with legion of others] Ruddock takes inaction to ensure Hicks stays far from Australia for the longest possible time. To the interviewer’s credit she reminded Ruddock of the five years already Hicks has been in Guantanamo and still detained in USA custody, still in jail. By asking, “How much time does it take for Hicks to be returned?”
Judging by Ruddock’s vacuity our Attorney General answers questions in a fashion that betrays him working to a nefarious agenda, a contrived opposing agenda of Australia. He is a puppet, a voice of subservience in obsequiousness to the Bush administration and its liberty killing focus?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)