Opportunity for Australia of Free Investment Cash

If the high priests of Canberra and their ultra top heavy corporate shifty pals are looking for bucket loads of cash, and who isn't? You've heard of "Where the bloody hell are you?" Now its found, the Mother Lode is on Australia’s bloody doorstep

The truly aspiring globalisers of Howards crooked fascist cabinet will be beside themselves wondering how much they can syphon off for their offshore banking accounts. These crooks have to own some secret cash stacked away from profiting corporate friends. Hell how could you screw more than 80% of the Australian population just for a politician’s wage?

Two wicked Presidents, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are ready to spend billions of dollars (or euros more likely) financing projects in other countries if you have the right credentials.

These oil rich nations have cash available to be used for projects in friendly third countries. Hell Australia is friendly… my mistake, we used to be friendly until we signed on with the preemptive warfare idiocy of the Anglo-American nuts we foolishly align our sorry Canberra butts with. At the cost to our self esteem, our free thinking, our international standing, our low morale standing and chicken shit manipulation from Canberra of the Australian population.

We know how easily Australia’s Federal Government is bought off by any influence other than the general Australian populace. So a tidy project to underpin investment in countries whose governments are making efforts to liberate themselves from the (US) imperialist yoke is sure to be a winner with our internationalists. Face it! If Canberra can be brought off once by the Anglo-American money circle it can be brought off twice when the stakes and cash are high enough by the Persian-South American oil circle boys?

We seem to be running light on cash for major infrastructure these days. Obviously the available money for our public health system is running low, given as a levy is going to be needed to run the medical system. Then there is the need for capital to build electricity generation, plainly nothing for this as we have a shaky electric supply making Australia look more like a developing country each summer. Also if my memory serves me right quite a few of the schools could do with some cash for repairs and long overdue for teaching equipment to match the private schools. Oh and we used to have a state funded university system, so that apparently needs some cash. Man I’m sure one or two more items would come to mind if I think about it.

Of course there is, we need some water in Australia. Given the remarkable absence of new dam construction, or pipeline delivery systems to move water around the country, like from where it is up north to where it isn’t down south. I mean we’ve got to the stage where The Age newspaper is running articles about the farmer tossing the game in, leave the land. Forgotten to protect our infrastructure to preserve our capacity to feed ourselves, or export foods have we? Because I would think with some free piles of investment cash we could spend freely to construct the water supply infrastructure we apparently can’t afford in 2007. How many years is it we’ve known of this business of residing on the driest continent on the planet? Messy how overdue stuff like selling off the country and not construcing infrastructure behind a bunch of claptrap catches up with one eventually?

Now Venezuela and Iran are probably willing to come to Australia’s rescue? Providing Canberra makes one slight adjustment to their thus far demonstrated screwy thinking! What terrific news for the lucky country that we might become the lucky country again, providing Canberra puts its hands out, head down and shares in some oil bucks courtesy messers Chavez and Ahmadinejad?

Realistically I know it’s a stretch to expect Canberra to wean itself off the US imperialist yoke for the hard cash. But the point is our puppet like stride with Bush and Cheney costs Australia’s people big time. First our global friends are falling off the boardwalk as we strutt in the shadow of a big military bully US juggernaut. Speaking of which we are chucking bucket loads of taxpayer hard earned cash down the toilet despatching our military into Iraq, Afghanistan, the South Pacific and probably Somalia if we look a harder. Given the penchant for mercenery contracts for our men and women in uniform these days our military is on stand by anywhere Bush & Cheney sends them. No matter what perception Howard tries to tell you to fall for– Canberra won’t want to miss out on the fireworks coming up when USA starts killing Iranians behind a bombing and heavy missile attack justified by a pack of fabricated terrorist nonsense and nuclear non-threat bull.

Anyway go ahead Canberra, change your stripes for some hefty oil cash. We don’t mind, hell Howard and the boys have pushed the old leopard skin and his spots trick so many times he can readily give George W. Bush a lame excuse for our preemptive economic switch to the so called destabilizing influence of Hugo and Mahmoud. Howard’s given Australia plenty of pathetic excuses of fairy tales of terrorism threats at home to why a haul of industrial relations laws had to be abonded for the forces pushing down upon this nation of dirt cheap labour by that nasty China and dirt cheap India.

Why wouldn’t Australia be the least bothered to side with a couple of nations that are actually spending money on their own nation’s infrastructure and helping their own population?

Help yourself get reelected Prime Minister Howard, Costello, Downer and the boys and liberate yourselves from the unpredictable dangerous US imperialist yoke, be a friendly third country on the receiving end of joint cooperation bid as allies in a Persian-South America-Australia pact. It even sounds cool!

Australian troops in Iraq

How much evidence do we need to see that Australia's government and military in Iraq is not part of the solution, it is part of the problem?

Painted in simple terms - Canberra's support of war criminals in the Bush/Cheney Administration leads to make Australia's political leaders guilty as accessories in war crimes, no different as if they had murdered innocent Iraqis, terrorised and destabilised Iraqis personally - and risk exploding the whole damned Middle East. The support by Howard's corrupt administration, the equally pathetic connivance of the ALP [Rudd same as Beasley opposition party) with support and assistance in Iraq [and Afghanistan], the greater is Prime Minister Howard, Foreign Minister Downer, the Howard Cabinet and Shadow Cabinet of Australia's leaders tied to the reality of their ultimate sentence of guilt of horredous war crimes against innocent people of a sovereign Iraq.

Canberra's rough ride of immorality as member in the posse of America's Sheriff of the world coalition blood bath, government manufactured Orwellian "War on Terror" is corporate branding of an arrogant geopolitical agenda. Its a Clever Dick theme (War on Terror, War on Extremism, whatever fits today) and it profiles Canberra's arrogance, its shoving and manipulation of an electorate grown weary and now angry at the very worst lies.

AUSTRALIA'S MILITARY DOES NOT HAVE A ROLE IN IRAQ. Australia's military and capital is being misapropriated in a criminal spendup to pursue population reduction and strategic objectives over the Middle East through murdering innocent Iraqis. Canberra is base to the most pathetic representatives this nation has ever been subjected to live under. Through our great [past] friend the USA Administration launched a horrendous miscarriage of justice, but true justice has a way to ultimately level out those who follow the illegal path. We should all look forward to such a period of public lynching.

Attorney General Ruddock - A slippery eel or fruitcake?

Caught an ABC radio interview of the Attorney General in August. My reaction after listening? The guy is a slippery eel or a full blown fruitcake.

The Attorney General responds to questions shot his way with a "duck and weave" formula, Blind Freddie would discern unmistakably this official is plainly not an authentic article? You can judge Ruddock is more a Lilliputian; a consequential government employee so he should be an important public servant? But his behaviour is more hired hand! Bet my bottom dollar this fruit cake is a puppet to hegemony seekers outside official public recognition?

The Attorney General’s language is chock a bloc full of distortion, little honesty is injected on the job. An indispensable characteristic of a real attorney general embodies accuracy and honesty; examination of this fruit cake's gazette is such judicious traits have cut class.

Moral and fair defence of the Australian citizen’s rights is abandoned for pathetic fallacious public relations, and a model of arrogance hidden within intimidation and coercian of the citizen whilst prosecuting the pampered darling, an endless war against terror. Ruddock rapes the citizen whilst he pretends to uphold the law - as he interprets its revision for Australia’s constituent police state.

The Attorney General confers sleeze and manipulation; he is a master of sophistry, responds to inquiry with bluster delivered inside non-answers. His public face is tedious and flat; misrepresentation through a string of laborious clarification, mingled with enough legalese to fool most. His is a bluster technique holding authoritative ground with interviewers and listener alike, by autocratic officious puffiness he restrains reality and truth from sight.

A listener grows tired fishing for a cohesive and authentic response. Half expect interviewers to wrap up interviews with Ruddock. Waiting and anticipating Ruddock will eventually reply with at least one straight answer about David Hicks is tiring. With a basic question, “When is Hicks being returned to Australia and what is the Government doing to help the situation?” Its a run around the bush Ruddock adopts to [not] answer the question. The top justice man in Canberra is a slippery eel or a fruitcake.

Asked about the return of David Hicks to Australia from Guantanamo military base after Hicks has been in the lock-up for 5 years? Croaked with nervousness, quivering with deceit Ruddock unhesitatingly clouded Canberra’s position with his I’m not my own man reply. Saying, “…such matters take a long time”. Talk about failure to demonstrate one iota of concern about Hicks case.

I conclude [with legion of others] Ruddock takes inaction to ensure Hicks stays far from Australia for the longest possible time. To the interviewer’s credit she reminded Ruddock of the five years already Hicks has been in Guantanamo and still detained in USA custody, still in jail. By asking, “How much time does it take for Hicks to be returned?”

Judging by Ruddock’s vacuity our Attorney General answers questions in a fashion that betrays him working to a nefarious agenda, a contrived opposing agenda of Australia. He is a puppet, a voice of subservience in obsequiousness to the Bush administration and its liberty killing focus?

Howard government to launch Australia into illegal war

It has become conceivable the Howard government is going to senselessly embroil Australia in an undeclared criminal war against Iran and Syria. Undeclared by Canberra who intends to throw our military - whose responsibility is Australia’s defence - to go to war in a country half way around the globe against Iran in war initiated by mentally short changed idiots occupying the White House. This country still ranks as a cheap colonial boy, at heal to Anglo/American dogs, when will we break the shackles that control Canberra?

The Australian flag will be bloodied and spoiled by innocent victims as our troops obey orders they should not obey. This nation will be remembered in history as nothing less than duplicitious bastards wearing the yoke of cheap mercenary sharp shooter. There is not a single politician in Canberra in the Liberal party or the ALP who will excape being branded as a war criminal and accomplice to preemptive war.

God almighty Canberra is going to launch an attack against a sovereign nation, against innocent people, Iran presents no threat whatsoever to Australian interests or US interest for that matter.

Australia’s military is already deployed in the southern Iraq province of Al Muthanna, from here they will redeploy to attack Iran’s sovereign territory. Their mission is to seize the assets of that country’s oil fields located in the province of Khuzestan, where most of Iran’s oil fields are located.

The United States will use a crushing aerial bombardment of Iran [and Syria]; Canberra will launch military assets to be sacrificed as a faithful slavish partner to murder innocent Iranians all to steal that nation’s oil fields. That Australia’s criminals in government are in readiness to throw this nation into warfare behind a pack of screwball mumbo-jumbo exposes the immoral and corrupt politicians in office.

Punching above his significance Foreign Minister Downer is now priming the populace with sophistry and blathering of sanctions against Tehran if it doesn’t stop its so called rebel nuclear program. Get one thing straight Downer, the Iranians have every right to a nuclear program. No rules of any kind are broken; Iran has not betrayed any protocol and exhibits no threat. Downer is striving to whitewash the verity with indoctrination to set a path of propaganda. If anything this only demonstrates that any suspending should be Downer’s idiocy, the man is unfit to hold the post of foreign minister, his blabbing neck is overdue for suspending from the public arena.

Attorney General Ruddock is Oddball over anti-terrorist laws

Consider for a second Attorney General Ruddock’s failed logic, his peremptory pain-in-the-ass hogwash. His conclusion from his tit tat with the ACT’s Jon Stanhope highlights a view that terrorists across this land hold a common thread? That common thread is their convergance of evil… a need to commit terror unleashed by annihilative minds only at sites where “weak” anti-terroism law enforcement exists?

Ruddock believes anti-terrorist fun and games will be handicaped by dissimilar laws between Canberra and Bondi Junction. This might be a display of paltry faith in law enforcement and the intelligence community? With different anti-terrorism thinking for officers to grapple with in the face of fighting the war on terror it could send some over the mental enforcement edge.

The Attorney General’s oddball sapience edifies an abstract, perhaps eerie rendition of anti-terrorism policing. Ruddock’s argument is hammered in noisy leaps against the sovereignty of others judgments, especially officials such as the qualified Jon Stanhope - who don’t play the anti-terrorism card Ruddock’s way.

Ruddock operates a peculiar “doctrine of inference” - it’s folklore, but it fundamentally believes terrorists unleash horror and sabotage in territories and places where laws are pithy – [compared to Ruddock’s version of enforcement]. If it’s a frail anti-terrorist law it fails Ruddock's acid test, that is not being equal to his expert appraisal. The result is substitution of the whole ball of anti-terrorist wax for a resize to suit Ruddock. Canberra cogitates that conformity across Australia equals we’re all safer?

By extrapolation of Ruddock’s thesis… we can form a loose clarity able to breathe security from the threat of frightening [government inflamed?] terrorism. The many strategic cool targets across this real estate can take advantage of Ruddock’s thinking - we will detour terrorists to hit only designated sitting ducks by location.

The plan is renounce anti-terrorism laws in remote areas of Australia. In isolated pockets such as King Island in Bass Strait; we will abandon anti-terrorist laws for designated special low-law intensity sites. Any indecent terrorist stunt or planned terrorist event would be unleashed under this policy away from the rest of the country. Isolated places in Bass Strait are the perfect terrorist sitting duck. By preserving terrorists under the easy-go low-law anti-terrorist program we are miles safer in this war on terrorism game.

We’ll designate the site a low-law terrorist heaven, it will attract the menace, [terrorism I mean, not Ruddock]. It can work, install make believe cardboard fuel dumps, fake ammo dumps and a couple of military HQ like buildings with visiting politicians lolly gagging around, hands behind their backs! Erect mock cardboard cutouts of tourists for a full “bring em on” effect. [Don’t you just love these cool Bush team rallying slogans courtesy Ruddock and Howard’s administration’s White House pals]?

Its common knowledge terrorists make beelines at targets exposed inside territory with go-easy interrogation and special sentencing. If we erect signs in airports to inform visiting terrorists of where the pithy anti-terrorist enforcement exists, we’ll garner our fair share of terrorists like flies to a jam jar. A King Island terrorist jam jar. This measure could protect a terrified citizenry from the threat Ruddock stresses is ready to chew our asses to shreds.

A bold move would be to advertise our go-easy anti-terrorist law regions around the global - reflective of the globalisation policy adopted in Canberra. Signs for inbound terrorists at our gateway airports and in our neighbour’s airport terminals, sea-lanes and wherever entry points for terrorists to walk in exist will be integral to direct the traffic.

Identifying where terrorists enter Australia is simple… Ruddock is a freaking whiz bang on the terrorism argument. He’s the official to pinpoint terrorist gateways, wherever he says, that’s where we sit signs.

The signs advice would also tell terrorists if they are caught detonating a terrorist event on King Island - we’ll go easy on them. What’s the loss in a few milkers, windy fields and noisy sea birds in exchange for the nation’s security? Sacrifice King Island for the safety of the nation.

Any protest by King Island citizens? The Attorney General can introduce penalties against disruption. A five-year jail sentence for non-conformity with Canberra’s neo-con fascist kings sounds about right. Ruddocks “Across Oz Same Same Easy Grasp Terrorism Laws” are the way to fly if you want to stay out of harm. Ruddock will avoid disquiet by imposing a prison term on all citizens who talk about what’s happening to them at King Island. Blab and publicise what happened to you at Ruddock’s hands… you would be sentenced under anti-terrorism provisions. Although it won’t matter for heaven’s sake if apprehended citizens want to blab anyway. Who will know where King Island is? Ruddock and Howard can be matriarchs of Australia’s King Island Guantanamo. Such a turn-on, an oddball like Ruddock would wet his pants over such an idea? Troublemakers could be locked up Guantanamo style without explanation.

As for this nonsense with Jon Stanhope “stuffing up the Ruddock way.” Stanhope’s strife means his time to learn to fall in line with the other sheepish premiers and state chiefs? The time is ripe for Ruddock to adopt another Bushite rallying cry winner, ‘Your either with us or against us!” Runing with this biggie of the New World Order, he can shove it down the throats of tremulous Aussies, it might turn the people against tall poppies like Stanhope and any others thinking out of line.

All in the name of heading off danger the Oddball says is ahead!