According to Israeli intelligence... High-rise buildings on Queensland Gold Coast are terrorist targets. Somehow this discovery, this incredible digging up of a secret plot going on virtually in "plain site" - of all places can you believe but in Internet chat-rooms? Thanks to brilliant defences dependable once more Israeli intelligence makes us aware of a potential terrorist target threat in Australia?
The go-between passing on this intelligence collecting gem, alerting the nation by describing Australia... "definitely a potential target" is Dr Mark Craig of Queensland University of Technology. This fellow a security specialist, teaches law/policing studies domestically and internationally. Dr Craig's credentials read pretty fine, it surprises me an accomplished lecturer attaches his name to a fundamental segment of inconsistency of Israeli intelligence - given its history of manipulation and self interest. In this instance I suspect identity of the true target in its sights, is namely the Internet. To profile Dr Craig's head alongside circumstantial, most likely manufactured evidence of a terrorist menace means Dr Craig's credentials provide some level of authenticity to make it appear... more credible?
Supposedly plain vanilla stare me in my face Arabic-language chat rooms are utilised to discuss sensitive possible terrorist targets? Terrorism in cyberspace? Of course, an obvious place to talk about blowing something up, in the privacy of public chat rooms? The inference of this report is in the absence of the medium of Internet chat-rooms, potential terrorist target discussion will be removed, incapacitated likely! For expression elsewhere presumably - but cyberspace terrorists would be powerless in the chat-room though!
Close to the truth is Australia probably has morphed into a terrorist target. The reason is freaking gutless wonders in Canberra, unable to keep their insane global fun and games hat locked in the bottom drawer. Even a bigger joke is Dr Craig talking about his Israeli intelligence source as, "It's a good source I have got it from. Australia is definitely, regularly mentioned by the chat rooms..." Jesus Christ imagine this pathetic claim? Heavens! I chat about possible terrorist targets with my 78 year old Mother, who talks terrorist targets with my 83 year old Dad. Most of our terrorist targets chats start with the White House, move to Canberra. Anyway then to other potential tricky targets, you get my point. We feel we can discuss terrorist targets, we think it gives certain interests in our consideration of global events.
Will this make Mom a confessed credible potential terrorist from our chat by this evidence of discussion? The fact potential targets are considered simply means, well, its being talked about. Its not as though the topic of terrorism and terrorist targets isn't pushed enough by government and self interested bogeys. That terrorism and terrorist targetting is heard in Arabic chat-rooms means its discussed in a public forum by Arabs along with everyone else. A lot of Arabs watch the world and chat about it, so what? If in Internet chat rooms it lends NO CREDENCE TO CONSIDER THE CHAT AS A THREAT TO ANYBODY. Arabic, Chinese or Icelandic chat-rooms constitutes no grave menace to the security. A conspiracy of silence on the other hand would defeat the overpaid, childish fantasy world of the strange ideas of Dr Craig and his Israeli intelligence boys. Silence would be dynamite to confuse all so termed intelligence.
When the source of the identified terrorism threat is uncovered by Israeli intelligence, of all those unable to restrain from fabrication of a false picture Israel is number one. Unchecked Israeli intelligence writes messages and eliminate much, carefully cleansed to protect and further perverted version of a security threat.
The intelligence Dr Craig speaks implicates Arabs. The Arab thorn is in Israel's side, Israel attempts to cripple on a permanent "understanding" everything Arabic. To turn into mockery Israeli intelligence as believable information - with the Jewish Arab struggle pervasive? A secondary objective by subtle construction is the mandate of the people's safety! That is protection of people from terrorist chatter [picked up in chat-rooms]. Convenient to shift Internet surveillance into Internet control, not openly spoken at this time by Western government as it drives into fascism.
To assure a fight to destroy terrorism through adopting of national action to disarm Internet treachery. The systems freedom, permitted by the net that supposedly will be claimed by the authorities to give power to unrestrained terrorism. An undeclared war will result to shut down by regulation the broad channel that hidden powers will use to incite more penetration and control over mankind's freedom of movement and expression.
It will be claimed the Internet freedom of access is a prominent terrorist threat. The current frame-up is of Arabs and open Internet. It means your future through disregard of the facts by implication... defects in Internet life will be disclosed as necessary to be acted on. A seeding of public opinion to a specific culprit, not a novel approach to plans laid to make objections powerless.
What is it, the reason, the driver that distinguishes Dr Craig to point out lawless, threatening terrorism? Is Dr Craig issuing warnings as a well-informed functionary? Is he serving the interests of Australians? Is his notice of evidence of potential terrorist target threats to arouse emotions only cirumstantial? Dr Craig and his intelligence source will require further assesment.
